🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to tango. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Conflict Regarding Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director who being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Power In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later bin him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.